Fast-Forward Time

in which I solve positive psychology

positive psychology

is a subfield that arose, afaict, when psychologists and philosophers talked to each other a bunch.

Psychologists: so if you have uncontrolled schizophrenia, or bipolar, or depression, or PTSD, these are all bad, so we help people get out of them
Philosophers: why?
Psych: so they can live more of the good life
Phil: what’s that?
Psych: uhh

And then we got a lot of dumb word-mashing arguments:
A: how do we help people get happier?
B: well there’s more to life than happiness
A: ok, how about helping people live the good life?
B: what’s the good life?
A: where people are happier
B: what’s happier?
A: right, ok, where we help people achieve eudaimonia
B: what is eudaimonia?
A: it’s where they’re living the good life
B: what’s the good life?
A: when people are flourishing
B: what’s flourishing?
A: when people have hedonic well-being
B: what’s hedonic well-being?
A: sigh ok, here’s a 3-part breakdown of flourishing/eudaimonia/well-being/satisfaction/whatever. or 4 parts. or 5 parts. (PERMA!) or 6 parts.
Bhutan: couldn’t help but overhearing; this sounds awesome, we’re going to measure Gross National Happiness
The entire TED conference, in unison: omg you all are enlightened wise mountain sages1

gosh, why bother

This is exhausting. Why was there so much froth about it? Two things jump out to me as still exciting on a personal level2:

  1. even asking about “how can people make their lives better, whatever that means”
  2. having some kind of metric to track “how good your life is”, and “is it going in the right direction”

This “how good is my life metric” still interests me. I want to answer questions like these3:

the metric

is surprisingly easy: ask myself, “Do I want more of my life?”

If I woke up tomorrow and it was Groundhog Day and I just experienced today again (“for the first time”, so I’m not bored), would I be happy about it? What if I experienced it 3 times? 100 times?

(Sci-fi fans could say “would I want to spin up a copy of myself to relive today?")

Or, would I like to fast-forward today? Would I like to blink and it’s nighttime? If a copy of me were just spinning up and waking up this morning, and I knew it was going to re-experience yesterday once, would I prefer to let it run through the day, or would I shut it down?

some possible objections

I keep looking for ways this thought experiment fails, and it keeps not failing.

me rn, and disclaimer

Anyway. I’m in fast forward time right now. I’d love to go to sleep and wake up in 6 months. (not like Rip Van Winkle, but like I’ve lived like my normal self and it just happens to be 6 months later.) It’s not great. But at least I have a sense of how bad it is. Worse than any time since about 2013-14 at least; probably worse than that.

That said (and maybe I don’t need to say this but I’m going to err on the side of caution) fast-forward time is not the same as being sucidal. Just because you’d rather not experience today, that doesn’t mean that you never want to experience again, and it doesn’t mean that you’d accept all the pain (physical/mental, to yourself and others) involved in sucide. Fast-forward time is any day less than 0/neutral; su*cidal is when you’re below -10.

And while I’m personally less than 0, I’m nowhere near -10, and I do have all the support networks where I feel confident I’d get the help I need if I did get that bad.

  1. Bhutan: also all our ethnic Nepalese people are exiled. TED: sorry, we lost interest ↩︎

  2. of course I’m steering clear professionally, I hate doing this kind of work. but I do want my life to be better. ↩︎

  3. I’m also a little bit interested in finer-grained questions: “does taking ashwagandha make my life better?” but I think the answer to these are either a definite yes, or too hard to tell ↩︎

  4. Not claiming I have had very hard struggles. But I’ve had struggles that were bad enough that they’re scars, not pleasant memories. ↩︎

blog 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010